Tales of a Technician: Covered Calls: Weekly vs. Monthly | Tackle Trading

Tackle Trading
5 min readMar 16, 2016


Tales of a Technician: Covered Calls: Weekly vs. Monthly | Tackle Trading

With the advent of weeklys options the choices facing option traders has multiplied ten-fold. But it shouldn’t be overwhelming. All you need to understand are the principles undergirding expiration and strike selection and your choice should be easy. Whether you’re selling covered calls, naked puts, or engaging in one of the myriad other strategies, you don’t need to re-invent the wheel every time you initiate a new trade.

I received a great question from Robbie in response to last weekend’s newsletter on Covered Call Perfection.

“Is there a set of rules or wisdom you can impart when it comes to choosing the right time to expiration for covered calls?”

Let’s start with the obvious. Covered call sellers focus on using short-term options to maximize time decay. 30 to 45 days is the most common. Perhaps you’re wondering if it’s better to use weeklys if they’re available on the stock you own. The answer is yes and no.

Remember, Wall Street is a world of trade-offs and nowhere is this more apparent than when trading covered calls. I’ve included a few comparisons in the accompanying graphic above. Let’s dig into each.

First, you have the choice of selling one monthly option or four weeklys over the same time frame. In the above graphic I used USO options and compared selling one April 10 call for 37 cents or four 10 weeklys calls between now and April which would generate about 58 cents.

When it comes to income generation Weeklys have the upper hand. But we can’t stop there. How about cost?

If you sell monthly covered calls you’re essentially paying one commission a month. If you sell four weeklys you’re paying four commissions. The transaction costs for the weeklys route is four times greater. If you’re paying a minimal amount of commission perhaps this isn’t a big deal. If you’ve yet to get your commission down to around $1 a contract then this could be a big negative associated with weeklys.

Using monthly options wins the transaction cost contest.

Now, what of protection? Let’s say I sell the April monthly covered call for 37 cents and you sell the Mar4 weekly for 16 cents. Then USO plummets. Initially I have more than double the amount of protection as you. My call premium will offset a 37 cent drop in the stock yours will only offset a 16 cent drop. Now, sure you can roll to bring in more premium but so can I. That doesn’t negate the fact that traders who short monthly options carry more protection than those with weeklys.

From a downside protection standpoint, monthly options are superior.

One final comparison of note is liquidity. Monthly options are more liquid. The open interest is virtually always higher, the bid-ask spreads tighter. As a result the slippage suffered using weeklys is arguably higher.

If you’re concerned with liquidity, monthly options are your go-to.

There’s your match up. I consider monthly options more conservative, weeklys more aggressive. As usual, pick your own poison.

# Sign up now for a 15-DAY FREE TRIAL #

Financial freedom is a journey

The Tales of a Technician series is brought to you by Tackle Trading.

Sign up now and gain unfettered access to all of the quality content and powerful Scouting Reports that our Pro Members enjoy for 15-days absolutely free with no strings attached and let us show you what your trading has been missing.

# Sign up now for a 15-DAY FREE TRIAL #

Legal Disclaimer

Tackle Trading LLC (“Tackle Trading”) is providing this website and any related materials, including newsletters, blog posts, videos, social media postings and any other communications (collectively, the “Materials”) on an “as-is” basis. This means that although Tackle Trading strives to make the information accurate, thorough and current, neither Tackle Trading nor the author(s) of the Materials or the moderators guarantee or warrant the Materials or accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from the use of the Materials, whether based in tort, contract, or otherwise. Tackle Trading is providing the Materials for educational purposes only. We are not providing legal, accounting, or financial advisory services, and this is not a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any stocks, options, or other financial instruments or investments. Examples that address specific assets, stocks, options or other financial instrument transactions are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to represent specific trades or transactions that we have conducted. In fact, for the purpose of illustration, we may use examples that are different from or contrary to transactions we have conducted or positions we hold. Furthermore, this website and any information or training herein are not intended as a solicitation for any future relationship, business or otherwise, between the users and the moderators. No express or implied warranties are being made with respect to these services and products. By using the Materials, each user agrees to indemnify and hold Tackle Trading harmless from all losses, expenses and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from user’s use of the Materials. In no event shall Tackle Trading or the author(s) or moderators be liable for any direct, special, consequential or incidental damages arising out of or related to the Materials. If this limitation on damages is not enforceable in some states, the total amount of Tackle Trading’s liability to the user or others shall not exceed the amount paid by the user for such Materials.

All investing and trading in the securities market involve a high degree of risk. Any decisions to place trades in the financial markets, including trading in stocks, options or other financial instruments, is a personal decision that should only be made after conducting thorough independent research, including a personal risk and financial assessment, and prior consultation with the user’s investment, legal, tax, and accounting advisers, to determine whether such trading or investment is appropriate for that user.

Originally published at tackletrading.com on March 16, 2016.